Our Soverign Emperor, Lord Donald John Trump, President of these United States

nacho

"Big Guns"
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
7,105
140
63
On the river...
www.teletraanone.com
I'm not worried. What are they going to do, drive out in the country and protest while I ride my John Deere? There aren't even enough lefties here (outside of the university 40 miles away) to mount a sidewalk campaign. Even if there exists a wild movement to riot and burn shit to the ground, it'll never get here. Low population density and an abundance of gun owners... Rural living is like an oasis against that kind of nonsense.

Plus, SJW's don't own boats, so they won't be rolling up on the river... like :pirate:. I'm ready either way :laugh:
 
Likes: G.I.*EDDIE

nacho

"Big Guns"
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
7,105
140
63
On the river...
www.teletraanone.com
Yeah, no extreme lefties own boats. If you think about it, owning a boat is a luxury that comes with settling down, buying a home, and generally getting your shit together, even if you're lower-middle class. It's extremely rare for a renter or urbanite to own a boat or have anywhere to store or use it. I'm not concerned. And the road to my house is a secluded dead-end. One way in, one way out. It's why we don't even have white trash crime in our little neighborhood.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
I've noticed not only the radical left calling for civil war, but also people on the right. It feels like they ALL are trying to convince us that we want/need one. Like a concerted effort to rile ALL of us up. WTH?

But yeah, the reality of one happening is absurd. No one has uniforms, so who do you fight? Who do you kill? Who says "GO!" And if you drive around anywhere, the "insanity" of it all that MSM and social media people are trying to convince us exists, isn't there. At worst you'll have small manageable packs of crazy lefties getting arrested. Of course we all know the following, but from Q...

MSM will portray progressive activists as a large part of the pop – this is FALSE.
But hypothetically, I've wondered about them not having a good fighting army. I'm not thinking of the beta boys and girls, I'm thinking about the illegal uncounted army. And that army armed with who knows how many illegal trafficked guns. We know they both exist. Does the left have control over them enough to weaponize them?
 

NSA

Brotherhood
Admin
Mar 13, 2011
24,032
194
63
Southern California
www.fighting118th.com
No way they could weaponize the illegals or Muslims or whatever. I mean, I guess there is a way, but it seems so far out there that I don't think it's worth considering.. but since we're here..

They'd need to setup some kind of command & control system.. under the radar.. with leaders and lieutenants and all that.. and somehow be able to communicate nationwide with the different bands of 'insurgents'. I suppose they could do it all with isolated cells, but that seems like it would fizzle pretty fast. Bigger question.. what's the incentive for these people to do their bidding? If they're already here they don't need MORE US. Also the fact that most of the central and south american countries don't like each other very much means you won't really have an effective combined fighting force.

Who would they be targeting though? I mean outside of people with confederate flags on their trucks, how do you know who is conservative or liberal? or moderate?

The only vague sense making plan would involve THE CABAL or whatever, and a plan to divvy up the US into client states of other countries.. the South West goes to Mexico, maybe the north east and north west goes to Canada.. some sort of occupying force in the heartland to siphon it of resources.. or something.. but all of that is just silly and not practical.

The inability to decipher who was with who would be a huge issue for both sides. Perhaps a race war then? That would suck for the white liberals though, and they're still outnumbered in most places.

I don't think anyone really wants an armed conflict, they want little annoying attacks to ratchet up the tension, and either scare people into not voting or encourage their followers to get out and vote and use shady practices while they're at it.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
:wtf:

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 3831d8 No.1940684 📁
Jun 28 2018 11:22:02 (EST)
Why are they trying to ‘normalize’ this?
https://nypost.com/2018/03/05/facebook-survey-asks-users-if-they-condone-pedophilia/📁
What is coming?
Do they really believe this will EVER be swallowed?
Will the progressive LEFT defend and support these actions once those guilty are brought to LIGHT?
These people are SICK!
They do NOT love this country.
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: aaf6b0 No.1942596 📁
Jun 28 2018 13:25:13 (EST)
Trying to ‘normalize’.
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/06/28/netflix-under-fire-for-film-critics-say-contains-child-pornography.html📁
Who just joined the Board of Netflix?
Who pushed?
What is coming?
Q
 

nacho

"Big Guns"
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
7,105
140
63
On the river...
www.teletraanone.com
I saw those drops and didn't know what to make of them. I saw the netflix story on fox news, some art film from Argentina apparently has some questionable content between 10yo girls? I'm not streaming it to find out.

No joke, sometimes I feel like we've gone through the wormhole and this is the bizarro world on the other side.
 

pcsguy88

Number 2
Staff member
Mar 14, 2011
9,707
171
63
KC
www.fighting118th.com
I saw those drops and didn't know what to make of them. I saw the netflix story on fox news, some art film from Argentina apparently has some questionable content between 10yo girls? I'm not streaming it to find out.

No joke, sometimes I feel like we've gone through the wormhole and this is the bizarro world on the other side.
It’s proof of the Mandela Effect. It’s the only paranormal thing that seems to be more legit as the days go by.
 

pcsguy88

Number 2
Staff member
Mar 14, 2011
9,707
171
63
KC
www.fighting118th.com
No way they could weaponize the illegals or Muslims or whatever. I mean, I guess there is a way, but it seems so far out there that I don't think it's worth considering.. but since we're here..

They'd need to setup some kind of command & control system.. under the radar.. with leaders and lieutenants and all that.. and somehow be able to communicate nationwide with the different bands of 'insurgents'. I suppose they could do it all with isolated cells, but that seems like it would fizzle pretty fast. Bigger question.. what's the incentive for these people to do their bidding? If they're already here they don't need MORE US. Also the fact that most of the central and south american countries don't like each other very much means you won't really have an effective combined fighting force.

Who would they be targeting though? I mean outside of people with confederate flags on their trucks, how do you know who is conservative or liberal? or moderate?

The only vague sense making plan would involve THE CABAL or whatever, and a plan to divvy up the US into client states of other countries.. the South West goes to Mexico, maybe the north east and north west goes to Canada.. some sort of occupying force in the heartland to siphon it of resources.. or something.. but all of that is just silly and not practical.

The inability to decipher who was with who would be a huge issue for both sides. Perhaps a race war then? That would suck for the white liberals though, and they're still outnumbered in most places.

I don't think anyone really wants an armed conflict, they want little annoying attacks to ratchet up the tension, and either scare people into not voting or encourage their followers to get out and vote and use shady practices while they're at it.
Wouldn’t they just go hangout in Mexico until it was over? If they wanted to shoot at angry people, wouldn’t they have just stayed home to begin with?

There’s no way I’d fight these days beyond hood defense and the point of no return. What the hell do I have to gain from the country being ripped apart by bullets? Sure the shit wouldn’t be put back together better than now prior to me dying of old age. Anyone chanting civil war needs to look at before and after pics of Beruit or Aleppo. Dumbasses.
 

NSA

Brotherhood
Admin
Mar 13, 2011
24,032
194
63
Southern California
www.fighting118th.com
That movie.. yeah it's a foreign film, so they're always a lot 'looser' with sex and stuff than we are. The scene in question is two girls (probably 10) watching a western TV show. As they're watching a long they grab pillows and 'gallop' along.. well one of them orgasms and yeah.. so it's very weird, but there is nothing explicit shown, it's just implied. I would chalk it up to a cultural difference more than any kind of scheme or ploy to suddenly make pedophilia acceptable.

And yeah, a civil war is a no-win game. I mean, someone will win but it sure as hell wouldn't be us.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
I think the attempt to "normalize" is the bigger issue. You see it a LOT, especially in the LBGT circles. Pushing the degeneracy on kids IN SCHOOL. Articles asking for sympathy for pedos. Suggesting they are commendable for their restraint. That dog show cartoon movie painting the "go to your happy place" picture when the young dogs get fondled by the judges.

Taken individually, it doesn't seem as obvious or concerted. Viewed as a whole...wtf is going on??

I'm reminded of this pic.

1abbabababa.jpg

First, it was be open to gay people. Then be okay with them parading themselves down the streets. Let them get married! Be tolerant of trannies. Let dudes pee with your little girls. Let them brainwash your kids. Be tolerant of the adults that want to f%$# your kids. Next? Lower the age of consent? No age of consent? Hyperbole? Did anyone EVER think that ANYONE would be attempting to humanize pedos? Yet, here we are.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
Pretty good. I like this comment...

Just as the Deep State has been using the mainstream media to leak classified information that is damaging to the Trump White House, Trump is doing the same through QAnon in order to expose the Deep State. Therefore, the QAnon information represents a visible sign of a clandestine information war being conducted by the Trump Administration and the Deep State to gain public support for competing agendas.
It makes Q easier to accept in that context. Just like Twitter, Q is Trump's method of going around the media.

I like the question Q brought up the other day...

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: f240d5 No.1952583 📁
Jun 28 2018 23:18:21 (EST)
>>1952489
We are waiting for a reporter to ask the ultimate question.
What are they waiting for?
They can end this at any time simply by asking POTUS, right?
We may have to ‘force’ this one.
Q
Why is the media just claiming Q is a conspiracy instead of just asking Trump or the White House directly if it is?
 

nacho

"Big Guns"
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
7,105
140
63
On the river...
www.teletraanone.com
Honestly, I think Q is substantially more effective with a bit of mystery to him. The minute it's out in the open that Q is just Trump or a white-house proxy (even though that's what everyone highly suspects), then the ability to leak effectively goes out the window. The ability to be cryptic goes away because the press would just question every drop at every press briefing, and every word would be dismissed in the same fashion as Trump's twitter rants.

It's like when you're a kid and you suspect there is no tooth fairy, easter bunny, or santa claus... but finding out for sure is a bit of a bummer.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
So the media is in a pickle. Ask the question and expose the truth (assuming it's true) and ALL of the information that's been dropped, or keep the mystery and excitement behind the conspiracy alive.
 

pcsguy88

Number 2
Staff member
Mar 14, 2011
9,707
171
63
KC
www.fighting118th.com
I agree with #2. If you didn't watch the news or live in Kalifornia you would think it's a great time to be alive. Can't remember the last time I've seen people yelling at each other anywhere and I'm downtown in the middle of large groups often.

Now saying we are firmly divided is correct, but the amount of people willing to do more than piss in their own wheaties is insignificant. The real escalation is the way that the politicians treat each other and the MSM.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
Yeah, not watching or reading the news, everything is awesome! But I do get a slight impression that, knowing what we know, it wouldn't take much to set off a powder keg. I don't expect "CIVIL WARRRRR!!!", but I could easily see some serious clashes happening. I just don't think that there are enough people that are THAT into politics to think it's worth throwing down for.

Now, what if (I don't think that it will happen) they outright banned guns of all types. What do you guys suspect would happen?
 

pcsguy88

Number 2
Staff member
Mar 14, 2011
9,707
171
63
KC
www.fighting118th.com
Yeah, not watching or reading the news, everything is awesome! But I do get a slight impression that, knowing what we know, it wouldn't take much to set off a powder keg. I don't expect "CIVIL WARRRRR!!!", but I could easily see some serious clashes happening. I just don't think that there are enough people that are THAT into politics to think it's worth throwing down for.

Now, what if (I don't think that it will happen) they outright banned guns of all types. What do you guys suspect would happen?
Exactly why they never will in our life times. The Dems have admitted it to be impossible on several occasions. It's also the reason they are programming the younglings to be terrified of them so they give away the right after we die.

:laugh:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/06/politics/donald-trump-montana-speech/index.html

11. "We will take that little kit and say, but we have to do it gently. Because we're in the '#MeToo' generation so I have to be very gentle. And we will very gently take that kit and we will slowly toss it, hoping it doesn't hit her and injure her arm even though it only weighs probably two ounces. And we will say, I will give you a million dollars to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test so that it shows you're an Indian."
 

ThunderDan19

Here Comes the Boom!!!
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
6,798
151
63
43
VA
Now, what if (I don't think that it will happen) they outright banned guns of all types. What do you guys suspect would happen?


Sanctuary cities, counties and states? We are in a time where "it's the law" means very different things, depending on who's in charge of your locality. At some point that will result in an exchange between overlapping authorities... then things will get very interesting indeed...
 

nacho

"Big Guns"
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
7,105
140
63
On the river...
www.teletraanone.com
For a civil war to happen, you have to have a big group of people to be seriously aggrieved and have their lives/livelihoods in major jeopardy. There are virtually no people in this country that fall into that category. Unemployment is low, jobs are more plentiful than in a long while, and stepping back for a second, there has never been a better time to be a minority in this country. They might not be 100% satisfied with how the world works, but there is no place on earth that treats their minority classes better.

Twitter outrage, small mobs paid for by Soros and Co, and protests over police shootings do not a civil war make. No matter how many angry facebook posts and hashtag slogans get made, none of those people want a war, nor do they actually care about those things enough to die over it.

The right doesn't want a war because we simply fumed for 8 years until we could vote in candidates that were less awful. The left doesn't want a war because 1) they have no guns 2) they LOVE to have a cause. They feed on having a cause and something to complain about. But if you pressed them, none of those things matter enough for them to actually sacrifice anything. It's all virtue signaling.
 
Likes: G.I.*EDDIE

ThunderDan19

Here Comes the Boom!!!
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
6,798
151
63
43
VA
Well stated. I think the aforementioned conflict between authorities has more potential to incite something. Another potential flashpoint might be regular citizens taking the law into their own hands when authorities fall short on something like immigration (say at the border or in a sanctuary city) or something. But I'd imagine these would be pretty limited in scope and duration.
 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
I think most folks wouldn't want to risk getting involved in whatever skirmish may present itself just to wind up in jail for the rest of their life when reality sets back in. During the actual 1800's Civil War, if you got involved and killed someone and it didn't turn into an actual war, you could've snuck off and no one would've been the wiser. Now? Pfft. Cameras EVERYWHERE. You get involved now with a "war" and you're life could be over. All to protest some movement that you've been manipulated to support? Do you feel that strongly? 🤨 Yeah, again, I doubt most would.
 

pcsguy88

Number 2
Staff member
Mar 14, 2011
9,707
171
63
KC
www.fighting118th.com

I had to stop reading when his proof is “amazing” in a Trump tweet. I mean, that word comes out of Trump 40 times a day. Anyways, I grew tired of Neon a few weeks back since he just can’t reel in the overblown speculations and switched to Prayingmedic on YouTube. Dude is far better at explaining things and keeping it at a believable level. As an example (since who is Q is the hot topic during this quiet period), here is his version:


And here is his proofs video:

 

G.I.*EDDIE

gobbles a LOT of cock
Founder
Mar 14, 2011
41,647
239
63
S.E. Mich :(
Yeah, I've actually seen a lot of "proofs" and thought, "Umm, that could WAY too easily be explained away as coincidence...try harder, anons"

I'll check that guy out. Though I'll be honest... I unintentionally black pill myself regularly taking in the reality of our situation. Sometimes Neon's exuberance is a welcome distraction to my cynicism.