Right, it seems simple, to the point of being basic. Above all else, money talks. That's the only reason NK and Iran ever come to the table, because we cut off their funds. Now central and south america get a heaping helping of that medicine too. Like children, they may not like it, but if they're going to live under our roof, they're going to play by our rules or risk being cut off. We are not a fucking charity. You want aid money, you'd better dance, monkey.
How HAVE we gone this long without a president with balls?
You can always count on Woods to tell it like he sees it.
A person's sex is overwhelmingly pretty cut and dry by innie vs. outie (save for the <1% that either have a birth/genetic defect or have been accidentally/self/surgically mutilated). That much should not be hard, even for leftists. But, our poor educational system apparently makes it hard for today's young (and some older people who should know better) to differentiate sex from gender.
Gender truly is a just construct. It is a set of perceived (up until recently pretty accurately) traits (stereo)typically assumed to be associated with one sex or the other. But these days males often do not act like men and females often do not act like women anyway. I blame a corrupted society, truly abysmal parenting, broken homes, abuse, mental illness and spiritual factors for that. So yeah, whatever.
Unfortunately though, the loss of gender roles is highly detrimental to a stable society. If you want a free, stable, productive, continuing civilization, you cannot do it with gender fluidity. If you cannot understand/accept your place, you are at a severe disadvantage to create, maintain and support a family, hold down a career, continue the species, defend the country, and a host of other necessary things that advanced western society requires.
Honestly, when you consider this, it's not hard to see why the leftists promote this kind of chaos.
I do wonder if the "digitization" of our culture and lives will make this gender fluid thing more.. widespread? Once we're all 0's and 1's, gender isn't a static thing anymore. I'm still not 100% convinced we'll get to a Star Trek holodeck or Ready Player One-type digital world.. but if it does happen.. or if they figure out how to upload consciousness to the cloud.. then people will just display/act/exhibit however they want.. whenever they want.
THAT will be a huge social change.. but it'll go along with everything else.
Fantastic article on this "gender" issue. I was completely unaware that the term was a marxist creation. Honestly, I should've known. Anything with subversive and destructive results should just automatically be known to be attributed to them by now.
Oh, I mean, "I get it". I just don't think it's very funny.. or clever.. or whatever. A lot of the "digital right" stuff is pretty witty and funny.. and I don't know, this feels like a swing and a miss to me.
Sometimes Trump just drops bait around to see which ones the MSM will jump on (while he is accomplishing other stuff elsewhere). I think the "nationalist" thing was that. Unfortunately in this case, the pretend bombs have dominated the headlines. Maybe they'll come back to it once it's completely obvious they were just a political stunt (not that they'll ever acknowledge that).
Do they really think we are that stupid? Why is everything too perfect. Van so clean, perfect vinyl sheets on every window. Everyone would be tweeting that van if they saw it on the road. The hit list, then non functioning devices and reporters taking pictures of non processed mail. I have never seen something so fake. Makes me insane.
I've always imagined the NPCs with syllable-ated robo voice. Maybe that's why I enjoy it so. I now imagine all of the screaming lib talking points in robo voice. "But you are a fuh-king white may-el"
View attachment 11619