Doesn't Stark wind up with the Guardians at some point in the comics?
Yup. As does Captain Marvel at a later point.
Doesn't Stark wind up with the Guardians at some point in the comics?
Marvel insisted on this..... (Although I wouldn't mind an older Toby Spiderman coming out of retirement after somebody kills MaryJane. (Won't happen that way.)Here's hoping for a recast non-emo Spidey.
Doesn't Stark wind up with the Guardians at some point in the comics? So now it's him in space instead of Hulk? I love RDJ as Tony but I was hoping for more Hulk if someone somehow winds up in space with the Guardians towing them back to earth for Infinity War madness.
Ugh, I really wish we hadn't adopted the "post the entire article" standard here.
why? would you rather have no news?
well, you will just have to deal with it. The whole point of bringing news to us is to not have to jump off site, and not have to deal with the constant pop-ups these sites have embedded in them. Ya, know, a one stop site.
hehe, I got to bust your balls just once. This is from Wiki on Netiquette, just for you. Etiquette in technology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"When someone makes a mistake – whether it's a spelling error or a spelling flame, a stupid question or an unnecessarily long answer – be kind about it. If it's a minor error, you may not need to say anything. Even if you feel strongly about it, think twice before reacting. Having good manners yourself doesn't give you license to correct everyone else. If you do decide to inform someone of a mistake, point it out politely, and preferably by private email rather than in public. Give people the benefit of the doubt; assume they just don't know any better. And never be arrogant or self-righteous about it. Just as it's a law of nature that spelling flames always contain spelling errors, notes pointing out Netiquette violations are often examples of poor Netiquette."
What does it mean spelling flames?
No, I'd prefer that people post a link to the article instead. That way people can choose to click it and read, or not, instead of being presented with a wall of text that's entirely quoted from elsewhere.
It's better netiquette, for one thing, and there's no confusion about attribution or authorship that way. Most places online that I've been on for a while consider it bad form at least, and I suppose I've adopted that.
There are other reasons I think it's a bad idea, but I'll get into those next time I decide to bitch about it.
(Now I feel like Eddie with his damn Thor helmet issue)
Ha! It's what people do to Eddie for every mistake. Awesome!
Ha! It's what people do to Eddie for every mistake. Awesome!
But, no one is forcing you read it...just, scroll past it.
G.I.EDDIE said:It's funny how often I see everyone else make mistakes but choose to not say anything. It grates my skin occasionally, the simple ones mostly, but I don't usually like making people feel stupid, especially when I'm so often guilty myself.
I love that busting balls is something guys can do without hating each other. We know it's all in good fun. Women ON THE other hand (besides not having balls) just can't do it. If they do, they're suddenly thinking "that f*%#ing b!tch! "
I love that busting balls is something guys can do without hating each other. We know it's all in good fun. Women other hand (besides not having balls) just can't do it. If they do, they're suddenly thinking "that f*%#ing b!tch! "
Or this.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=INdljQlAEPc
Four future installments in the Marvel Cinematic Universe have received new release dates through 2019, including Thor’s next solo adventure as well as the first films for Black Panther, Captain Marvel and the Inhumans!
Marvel’s “Thor: Ragnarok†will hit theaters November 3, 2017. The following year, Marvel’s “Black Panther†will make its way to theaters on July 6, 2018, and Marvel’s “Captain Marvel†on November 2, 2018. Finally, Marvel’s “Inhumans†will now debut in theaters July 12, 2019.
The previously announced dates for Marvel’s “Avengers: Infinity War Part 1†and “Avengers: Infinity War Part 2†on May 4, 2018 and May 3, 2019, respectively, remain unchanged.
So, just how major are these changes? Well, the new Spider-Man movie obviously has Thor: Ragnarok's original release date, so the threequel has been moved to November 3rd, 2017 instead. That was when Black Panther was originally set to be released, and that movie has taken Captain Marvel's spot which in turn has taken the Inhumans' original slot. Confusing, eh? As a result, the latter has a totally new release date AFTER the second part of Avengers: Infinity War.
I know I'm in the minority here, but I wouldn't mind seeing an older Spiderman who comes out of retirement. Kind of a soft reboot of the Maguire series, similar to what they did with Hulk.
I read it wrong, Captain Marvel is getting pushed, not Cap 3. That made no sense, anyway. But still, having Spiderman debut in Civil War is a weird choice.
depending on who you choose to belive the original plan would be for spiderman to debut in.
option 1. Age of Ultron in a cameo (To late to make that happen)
I read it wrong, Captain Marvel is getting pushed, not Cap 3. That made no sense, anyway. But still, having Spiderman debut in Civil War is a weird choice.
Gah, moved all the Phase 3 talk from the Phase 2 thread. Happy, Eddie?!
Possible to tack something on after the credits, or do ya reckon they already have one of those prepared?
Possible to tack something on after the credits, or do ya reckon they already have one of those prepared?
I'm guessing there were two scripts written for civil war. One without Spidy and one with.
Feige and Pascal will have the final word on the casting. If there's someone I trust in Hollywood more than Joss Whedon, It's Kevin Feige.